For Syncretism:
The position of Buddhism in Nepal and Japan compared

By David Gellner

15 pages

I do not believe one is committed to fundamentalism by the simple recognition that some traditions are more stable or more systematic than others, and it is a serious anthropological question to ask why.

About: The History of Buddhism Mahāyāna

Published in 1997 in Social Anthropology by The European Association of Social Anthropologists.

Bibtex Data

@article{gellner-david1997-for-syncretism,
    title={{F}or {S}yncretism: {T}he position of {B}uddhism in {N}epal and {J}apan compared},
    author={David Gellner},
    publisher={The European Association of Social Anthropologists},
    year=1997,
    journal={Social Anthropology},
    volume=5,
    number=3,
    pages={277--291},
    keywords={roots,mahayana,religion},
    doi={10.1111/j.1469-8676.1997.tb00375.x},
    ranking={rank3},
    url={https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:41b83d35-b0f1-468b-8923-ec863129ce35/download_file?safe_filename=For%2Bsyncretism.%2BThe%2Bposition%2Bof%2BBudhism%2Bin%2BNepal%2Band%2BJapan%2Bcompared&file_format=application%2Fpdf&type_of_work=Journal+article}
}

Added	Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:35:33 +0700
Sorting Value	0.697

View this entry's source code on GitHub